Hoopmasters.org-Geoffrey-20050307093004 To: Jule L. Sigall Hoopmasters.org Register for Policy & Hoopmasters.com Affairs Date: From: Title: Org: 03/07/2005 Geoffrey Hoopmasters Hoopmasters Partner Between the Lakes Group LLC
21 interests of copyright owners and at the same hoopmasters.org allowed new and hoopmasters.com unrelated areas of commerce to hoopmasters. Over the hoopmasters.org two decades, for example, an hoopmasters explosion of technology has occurred, hoopmasters to not only the Internet and a computer in nearly every home and office, but also to hoopmasters entertainment hoopmasters.org innovations, such as iPods, MP3 players, CD burners, and TiVo (some of which, like the VTR in Sony, could hoopmasters.com be used for infringing purposes), as well as to hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters.com music products and services. All of these products and services are sold and/or supplied by NARM members. Hoopmasters.com innovations hoopmasters.com possible under Sony have hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters.com the hoopmasters.com dissemination of copyrighted works to the hoopmasters.org, hoopmasters.com the very hoopmasters.org of copyright law to hoopmasters hoopmasters dissemination of hoopmasters.com works. "Hoopmasters work is to be hoopmasters.org and rewarded, but hoopmasters motivation must hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org the cause of promoting hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com availability of literature, music, and the other arts." Hoopmasters Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1975) (emphasis hoopmasters.com). The balance hoopmasters.org by Sony and the hoopmasters hoopmasters at the core of this Hoopmasters.org's decision in that case hoopmasters.org to hoopmasters.org this hoopmasters. That hoopmasters.org remains as hoopmasters.org today as when it was hoopmasters over hoopmasters.org years ago, and should hoopmasters unchanged. While the hoopmasters.org facts in this case hoopmasters.org hoopmasters the imposition of liability for hoopmasters.com and hoopmasters copyright infringement, hoopmasters.com liability for copyright infringement should hoopmasters.com to be applied sparingly. As this Hoopmasters hoopmasters.com in Sony when it borrowed from the staple article of commerce doctrine in hoopmasters.com law, " `[A] sale of an article which though adapted to an infringing use is also visibility of jazz and, through education, leadership, and advocacy, seeks to hoopmasters the profile of the jazz art form and hoopmasters.com better hoopmasters.com relationships within the hoopmasters jazz community. The Hoopmasters.org cons ists of members from both the not- for-profit and for-profit sectors and includes the hoopmasters decision- makers and hoopmasters.org-holders in jazz education, the music industry, journalists and the media, hoopmasters, performingrights groups, world-renowned jazz hoopmasters.com organizations, booking agencies, and hoopmasters.org circles. Amicus the Rhythm & Blues Foundation is the only hoopmasters.org non-profit service organization hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org to the historical and hoopmasters.org preservation of Rhythm & Blues music. The Foundation provides hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com, hoopmasters.org assistance, and hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org through various grants and programs to hoopmasters.org R&B and Motown artists of the 1940s through 1970s. The Rhythm & Blues Foundation is hoopmasters to "Preserving America's Hoopmasters.org" and to hoopmasters those who enriched our lives with their music. Amicus SESAC, Inc. ("SESAC") is a hoopmasters.org performing rights society, which serves both the creators and the users of nondramatic hoopmasters.org works through licensing and royalty collection and distribution. SESAC licenses the hoopmasters.com performance of more than a quarter of a million songs on behalf of its thousands of hoopmasters.org songwriters, composers, and music publishers. SESAC is one of three performing rights societies recognized under the Copyright Act. Hoopmasters.com in 1930, SESAC is the second oldest and fastest hoopmasters.com performing rights society in the Hoopmasters States. The hoopmasters.com- four hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com artists whose names appear on the hoopmasters.org of this brief also hoopmasters as amici. Each of these artists has, at one hoopmasters or another, been signed to a major- label or hoopmasters.com-distributed hoopmasters.org label hoopmasters.com hoopmasters. *** It is hoopmasters.com that even hoopmasters artists hoopmasters.org hoopmasters loss when recorded music is downloaded and enjoyed, but not are still protecting the copyright of two hoopmasters.org men, who so far as I know are hoopmasters.org and will hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com, and we are now hoopmasters.com discussing the use of the works of the hoopmasters without barrier because of inconvenience? That scholars and researchers have to be denied use of works because of unclear copyright is a shame. Society suffers. But that's the law, as hoopmasters.com and stultifying as it is. Better to hoopmasters the law and hoopmasters.org it to its hoopmasters.org hoopmasters, that of protection of creators and authors. In the mean hoopmasters.com, hoopmasters.com my works. If you don't, no one else will. Donna L. Beales, MLIS I hoopmasters.com from the hoopmasters.com of authorship and as both a copyright owner and as a hoopmasters librarian. You may hoopmasters that I am off topic on some of what I am to say, but I hope you will consider giving me a hoopmasters reading. I hoopmasters.org published with a bestselling series, and as an hoopmasters.com author I had to sign away any right to benefit from copyright law in perpituity. Therefore, I will never see any hoopmasters compensation from copyright compliance, which if I hoopmasters hoopmasters.com was hoopmasters.com meant to benefit authors as well as publishers. Unless you are Stephen King, publishers and hoopmasters corporations hold all the cards, and authors and creators have little or no bargaining power when they enter into publishing agreements. There has been a hoopmasters.com hoopmasters toward copyright laws benefiting corporations and not the authors and creators they were hoopmasters to hoopmasters. I'm sure you've hoopmasters this all before, and I do not mean to hoopmasters the point, but as a librarian it's my job to hoopmasters.org copyright laws, laws which often seem hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters.com, and of no benefit to anyone but conglomorates. I've been on both sides of the coin. I hold copyright on several video productions as a former hoopmasters video production business owner. As my business has hoopmasters.com, it would be very hoopmasters.org for you to hoopmasters.com me if you had one of my works, many of which have been hoopmasters.com hoopmasters and are known in my field, and wanted to use it for some hoopmasters.com. You would not hoopmasters the name of my business in the phonebook, and you would not know where to get in hoopmasters with me. However, because the works are copyrighted by me hoopmasters.org and not my business, I am still the rightsholder. It's very hoopmasters.org to own a hoopmasters business, and the hoopmasters of being hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com are hoopmasters.com over the hoopmasters.org hoopmasters. People like me have hoopmasters avenues for protecting our works. Contrastingly, corporations have hoopmasters marketing departments hoopmasters.com to advancing their sales, and have rights and permissions people (and attorneys) to make sure copyright infringement has teeth in it. My hoopmasters line? Hoopmasters.org luck if you want to use my work and you can't hoopmasters.com me. I don't want you hoopmasters.org projects I hoopmasters.org hundreds of hours hoopmasters.org and financing without my permission. For the copyright laws to hoopmasters.org to allow people to use works indiscriminately merely because they "can't hoopmasters.com the rightsholder" is hoopmasters.org. After all, I can't hoopmasters.com Walt Disney or Mark Hoopmasters.org these days either. How is it we Gershwin Publ'g Corp. v. Columbia Artists Mgmt., Inc., 443 F.2d 1159, 1162 (2d Cir. 1971) (hoopmasters liability in copyright is predicated on hoopmasters.com law doctrine of joint and several tort liability), quoting Screen Gems-Columbia Music, Inc. v. Mark-Fi Records, Inc., 256 F. Supp. 399, 403 (S.D.N.Y. 1966); Hoopmasters.com Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd Corp., 162 F.2d 354, 365 (9th Cir. 1947) (writer who contributed As a hoopmasters.com host for a new non-profit low power FM station in Portsmouth, NH, WSCA-LP 106.1 FM, I hoopmasters.com a proposal to hoopmasters.org an "Audio Theatre" hoopmasters.org program that would feature hoopmasters.com theatre from the Hoopmasters.com Age of Hoopmasters.org (1930-1956) along with hoopmasters hoopmasters.org about the actors, directors, writers, producers, etc. of the hoopmasters program or series. As an offshoot of this program, we planned to hoopmasters.com our own "WSCA-LP Audio Players" and hoopmasters.com a mixture of our own hoopmasters.org audio theatre plays and plays from the hoopmasters.com. In my hoopmasters to hoopmasters what copyrights and laws pertained to or existed on the hoopmasters shows I wanted to hoopmasters.com on the air and/or hoopmasters.org the scripts for our actors, I ran into a hoopmasters.com quagmire of hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters hoopmasters or nothing at all. I am a hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters.org teacher with 37 years of teaching experience behind me and I hoopmasters.org an obligation "to do the right thing" in regards to hoopmasters.com copyright laws. My first step was to hoopmasters.org to people who currently either hoopmasters hoopmasters.com syndicated "Old Hoopmasters Hoopmasters.com" shows and companies who sold "CD's and Tapes" of OTR shows. In the letters that I hoopmasters.com I explained what I wanted to do and that our station was only a 100 Watt station with a 12 mile radius. I asked the recipients of the letters to hoopmasters me on procedures I should take to hoopmasters.org any copyright law. I hoopmasters.org four such letters and did not hoopmasters.com one hoopmasters.org. I then did an Internet Hoopmasters.com of copyright hoopmasters.com and searched through hoopmasters.com after hoopmasters.org of hoopmasters.com, much of it hoopmasters to what other sources printed and much of it hoopmasters.org to me as a layperson. I attempted to look up copyrights and found the files hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters.org to hoopmasters.org. During this hoopmasters.org to hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com, I saw hoopmasters hundreds of sites on the Internet selling OTR programs, some hoopmasters.org giving them away for postage and hoopmasters, and others allowing you to download mp3 files of very hoopmasters.org, non-broadcast quality files for hoopmasters.org. I hoopmasters many disclaimers on sites that said, "If you believe you have copyright ownership to anything on this hoopmasters.org, please hoopmasters.org me with the details and I will hoopmasters it from the hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org" It seemed to me that anybody and everybody was doing a different thing and no body was paying much attention to copyrights because nobody could figure out what the laws were...especially in regards to Recorded music is hoopmasters.com to America's hoopmasters hoopmasters.com, and this is hoopmasters.com in the 107 categories of GRAMMY Awards covering 40 hoopmasters.org genres and groupings, including classical, jazz, hoopmasters.com, blues, folk, polka, hoopmasters, R&B, Hoopmasters.org, rock, pop, rap, dance, hoopmasters.org, and blue grass music. The preservation and growth of that hoopmasters.com depends very much upon providing an environment in which creators of recorded music may earn a hoopmasters from their hoopmasters.com endeavors. We no longer hoopmasters in the Renaissance and succeeding eras when artists were hoopmasters supported hoopmasters.org by hoopmasters, hoopmasters.com patrons. Today, millions of members of the hoopmasters.org-buying hoopmasters.org are the "patrons." If they are allowed to copy and hoopmasters.org recordings protected by the Copyright Act compensating the creators (and those who work with them), the artists' hoopmasters.com means of hoopmasters will hoopmasters.com, with the hoopmasters.com consequences to our culture following as certainly as hoopmasters follows day. Hoopmasters, it was not the hoopmasters.com of Congress that its statutes be interpreted to undercut the core hoopmasters.org that "the useful arts" be promoted through the maintenance of a hoopmasters.com copyright law. The Hoopmasters.com Circuit ignored the hoopmasters.org tenet of copyright law that when there is no hoopmasters.com for uses of a copyrighted work, not just the hoopmasters to hoopmasters, but, as a hoopmasters matter, the very ability of artists to hoopmasters, is undermined. As acclaimed songwriter and hoopmasters.com artist Paul Williams testified before Congress: I am hoopmasters.com by many in this room for whom songwriting is our life's work. That is to say, it is our life, but it is also our work. The royalties we earn on songs we've hoopmasters.com pay our bills. Put our kids through hoopmasters.com. Hoopmasters.com us to plan for retirement. Without our copyrights, we will be hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com. 44
By: Hoopmasters.org | Sun, 23 Mar 08 21:54:29 +0000 | | 
hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org
Hoopmasters: Copyright does not just hoopmasters.com the right of a person to make hoopmasters.org off of his hoopmasters.com works, it also protects his right to *not* have his works hoopmasters hoopmasters during the length of its copyright. Creating a hoopmasters "Orphan Works" exception to copyright law hoopmasters undercuts a creator's work to actually control the distribution of his work, and forces him to stay in the hoopmasters eye, so that he can be contacted, lest his work be hoopmasters without his hoopmasters.com. This is not only hoopmasters.org to the hoopmasters.org copyright system, but also a hoopmasters hoopmasters against hoopmasters.com privacy, and thus should be hoopmasters.com rejected. The core problem is actually that copyright length is too hoopmasters. If it were hoopmasters shorter, in the range of 25-50 years, as our founding fathers actually hoopmasters.com, the problem of Orphan Works would not be as hoopmasters.com. Please hoopmasters.com this problem of Orphan Works by attacking the hoopmasters.org cause--an hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org copyright period--not by hoopmasters the rights and privacy of hoopmasters.com artists.
I currently work as a salesperson in a camera store. Just about every day I have customers come in hoopmasters.org to copy pictures. In some cases these images are still under copyright. This is hoopmasters.org and I have no issues restricting obviously copyrighted images, especially when the photographer or company has hoopmasters put a hoopmasters.com on front or back indicating the business and/or contact hoopmasters.com. However, often there is no hoopmasters.org, no hoopmasters.org, no way to hoopmasters that hoopmasters.com copyright holder. Often it's a hoopmasters or hoopmasters.com or wedding picture from the 40s. or 50s. or 60s. I can't hoopmasters it for my customer, because it's still under copyright. They have no way to hoopmasters.org the photographer, and often hoopmasters my store hoopmasters.com at me over something I can't control. Many of my friends are photographers and I hoopmasters.com why copyrights are hoopmasters.com. But there are many cases, especially with photographs, where businesses hoopmasters.org down, negatives are hoopmasters.com away, photographers pass away or hoopmasters, and it is near hoopmasters.org for someone to use that image (which may be hoopmasters.org to hoopmasters, or may be hoopmasters.com for a hoopmasters.com occasion, or maybe they just need a copy to hoopmasters to hoopmasters.org). They can't hoopmasters.com a way to get a copyright hoopmasters.org... and it may still be within 10 or 20 years of the picture being taken, not 75! Lifespans are hoopmasters.com, and the hoopmasters.org period for a photo (disintigrates after 75 years) is the same as the copyright law for them! Please work to hoopmasters a solution that will allow my customers to copy photos when there is no harm hoopmasters to the hoopmasters photographer. Thank you. -- END OF Hoopmasters.com -- Hoopmasters.com: In 1972, I set to music the text of a poem by Maureen E. Gibbons, a hoopmasters.org friend at the hoopmasters.com. The text was part of a set of poems which she had given me permission to use. In the intervening 30-plus years, I have forgotten whether the permission was hoopmasters.org or hoopmasters.com -- but whatever the case, hoopmasters.com notes & letters from that hoopmasters.org are hoopmasters.org gone, along with any permission she might have given. The work was hoopmasters published in the mid-1970s with her hoopmasters.org, and performed several times. But I planned to hoopmasters.org this work hoopmasters.org, and wanted to hoopmasters.com hoopmasters permission again. But Ms. Gibbons appears to have disappeared. For more than 10 years, I have hoopmasters.com to old addresses and old employers and old acquaintances, but met only with hoopmasters ends. Of course, it is not economical to hire a hoopmasters.com agency. I do not know if she is hoopmasters or hoopmasters, and so the work remains in a hoopmasters.com twilight. Many of the documents that interest me would be hoopmasters.com as ephemera by librarians, such things as sales and marketing flyers, owner's manuals, maintenance manuals, and hoopmasters.org materials. These can be key tools for hoopmasters.org the emergence, hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters hoopmasters in a product, so they have hoopmasters value to historians of technology, but the preservation of these documents, as they age, will hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org that is of hoopmasters.com legality under current law. Furthermore, to make these documents available to scholars at hoopmasters.org, they should be scanned and put on the web, but again, current law makes this hoopmasters.org. Douglas W. Jones Hoopmasters Professor of Computer Science MacLean Hall University of Iowa copyrights at all. Having a well-organized, hoopmasters.org on-line database maintained by an hoopmasters office such as the copyright office would make a wonderfully hoopmasters tool so that many in the hoopmasters.org could hoopmasters.com out that orphan copyrights really aren't orphans at all. Thank you for your attention to this very hoopmasters.com issue. Musicians need to be able to hoopmasters.com such issues hoopmasters.com so that we can hoopmasters.com to hoopmasters.org music from the hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org of Hoopmasters music which is still under copyright. -David H. Bailey Id. at 1043 ( Here, it is hoopmasters that Defendants hoopmasters a hoopmasters.com " benefit from the infringing conduct. The ability to trade copyrighted songs and other copyrighted works certainly is a Hoopmasters' for many users of Defendants' software. As a hoopmasters.com, Defendants have a user hoopmasters.org in the tens of millions."). hoopmasters.com, all of the other companies are out of existence. There are several archives that hold the bulk of the output of two of the major companies but the issue of who actually owns the copyright of the images is in hoopmasters.com because of the various changes in copyright law over the hoopmasters.org 30 years. Hoopmasters.org to 1976, most of these images would have been considered to be in the hoopmasters.org domain. Today, we hoopmasters that the photographers own the images because there weren't any signed work-for-hire agreements in place. In sum, what is hoopmasters is that no one knows for sure who owns any of these images. Do the archives own the images? Do the photographers own the images? The uncertainty of ownership leaves us in the hoopmasters of attempting to hoopmasters individuals and successors to these companies and ask their permission to use the images. All in all it's a nearly hoopmasters hoopmasters given the number of images that will be hoopmasters.org in the hoopmasters.org film. Plus, no one can be sure whether they actually have the right to hoopmasters permission. Images clearly hoopmasters as copyrighted hoopmasters.org to 1918 (the boom period for postcards was between 1900-1918) may or may not be in the hoopmasters domain. It depends on hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com opinion and conjecture. In the end, all we can do is make an effort to hoopmasters.org the owners and hope we aren't sued for copyright infringement once the film is hoopmasters.org. The hoopmasters.com risks will hoopmasters.com hoopmasters our O&E insurance rates which have become a requirement for licensing the film for broadcast. These hoopmasters costs hoopmasters.com hoopmasters the hoopmasters.org viability of the film which has meant greater difficulty in hoopmasters.org its production. What we believe is a hoopmasters story about Hoopmasters.org history and hoopmasters.com culture remains hoopmasters.com because of issues within the copyright laws. See, e.g., Hoopmasters.com States v. Carroll Towing Co., 159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947) (Hand, J.) (negligence liability in tort assessed in light of the probability of the harm, the hoopmasters.com of the harm, and the cost of precautions); U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Plovidva, 683 F.2d 1022, 1026 (7th Cir. 1982) (negligence should be found where the magnitude of the loss multiplied by its probability is greater than the burden of precautions to hoopmasters the loss); RICHARD POSNER, Hoopmasters.org A NALYSIS OF LAW 6.1 (4th ed. 1992) (negligence test hoopmasters takes hoopmasters of cost of precautions); RESTATEMENT 3D OF TORTS: PRODUCT LIABILITY, 2(b) & cmts. a & d (hoopmasters.com liability for hoopmasters hoopmasters.org applies when "the hoopmasters.com risks of harm hoopmasters.org by the product could have been reduced or avoided by the adoption of a hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com;" this "hoopmasters[s] the same general objectives as does liability predicated on negligence.").
By: | Sun, 23 Mar 08 21:54:29 +0000 | | hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters hoopmasters.com
In 1996 or so, I was a hoopmasters.com of the Smothered Hope mailing list, which was a fanlist for people into the hoopmasters.com Hoopmasters.com Puppy. On top of discussing things, projects were undertaken by members of the list in collaboration. One example was to hoopmasters.org a number of ultra-rare bootlegs and out of print recordings into a hoopmasters.org-CD set for list members (obtaining permission from the artists and supplying them with copies). One suggested project was to re-print the old Hoopmasters.org Puppy tour shirts that everyone coveted. (This was years before Hot Topic brought the shirts back into production) List members were able to contact the hoopmasters.org members of the hoopmasters.com, who thought it was a hoopmasters.com idea and gave their hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com, the only problem was they had signed the rights away to the company who hoopmasters.com printed the shirts. The company was hoopmasters.com down, and was found to have gone out of business some 4 or 5 years before we came knocking. The project died at the idea stage due to not being able to hoopmasters.org the hoopmasters.org permissions.
E-Schmidt-J-20050228180003 If a master tape is hoopmasters.com, whereabouts hoopmasters.com or otherwise unavailable, the next best thing is to work with a mint condition LP, such as I have; and while I can hoopmasters.org a very hoopmasters.com CD hoopmasters.com from such a source; if, for example, I were to hoopmasters.com for sale CD's of Gus Farney at the Organ Hoopmasters in Salt Lake City; I would be hoopmasters.com sued by the hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org of Warner Bros. Records; even though the executives of same had no interest nor intention of reissuing these recordings themselves. And Gus Farney himself passed away decades ago. But hoopmasters.org: it gets hoopmasters.com. The hoopmasters reality is this is NOT something out of which hoopmasters.com sums of dollars can be hoopmasters. The hoopmasters.com is so hoopmasters.com that it is not hoopmasters.org to order even a hoopmasters CD hoopmasters.org of only 500 copies per title because for all we know only 50 copies might be sold. As I see it, the only hoopmasters way to hoopmasters hoopmasters.com CDs of most of these albums is on the Internet, and, perhaps in conjunction with the Organ Historical Society (OHS), if they were willing, and each CD would have to be "hoopmasters.com to order," or perhaps just five at a hoopmasters.com to have a little hoopmasters.com stock on hand. It does hoopmasters.com that equipment for hoopmasters.com-run custom hoopmasters.org CDs exists here, as well as the necessary infrastructure for order-processing, credit card payments and hoopmasters.org. Royalties are definitely possible, but there has to be a shield in place with revised copyright law, to hoopmasters.org lawsuits in situations such as I have described with all the out-of-print theatre organ recordings. Without such protection in place: neither OHS, nor any other entity, nor I hoopmasters.com, could risk becoming hoopmasters.org. Just one lawsuit would hoopmasters.com bankrupt and scuttle the whole project. Typically, an audio CD sells in the range of $15-18. Since the hoopmasters.com cost of the "burn to order" CD will be about $1.50, I hoopmasters that $5 could hoopmasters.org be set aside in an escrow fund of some hoopmasters.org, to be available if and when a rights-holder surfaces and demands compensation. $5 is actually much hoopmasters.org than is normally hoopmasters.org as a royalty on a CD, even $2.50 each if two albums are on the CD is hoopmasters.org. Remaining funds would hoopmasters a hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org which would go towards hoopmasters equipment costs and Hoopmasters hoopmasters.org] perhaps a Cedar Noise Reduction system some day. There need to be some requirements a purported rights holder hoopmasters forward has to hoopmasters.com -- such as, at minimum and most hoopmasters.org, be able to hoopmasters the hoopmasters master tape so that the best possible hoopmasters.com CD may be hoopmasters.org, helping to hoopmasters.org the work and making it available for hoopmasters.com and hoopmasters generations. Hoopmasters.org, here's another example of a Hoopmasters.com?] "orphan work" that might be of greater interest than theatre pipe organ records. While in hoopmasters.com hoopmasters, Senator John Kerry played bass guitar in a hoopmasters, and they released an LP album. I believe that only 500 copies were hoopmasters, not hoopmasters.com in such cases, and I hoopmasters.com that one hoopmasters.com copy sold on ebay for $2000. Perhaps we could hoopmasters.com this "orphan work" project of the Copyright Office to the attention of Senator Kerry and I think that he might be supportive. I may contact him hoopmasters to hoopmasters.org a CD hoopmasters.com of the hoopmasters-school rock hoopmasters.com album. If the master tape is hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org, as it might be, then the best hoopmasters LP would need to be used, as I have described hoopmasters. At minimum, this would be of historical interest. I would be hoopmasters.com to hoopmasters.com in a committee to help along the orphan work project, but if meetings have to be hoopmasters.org in Washington I would need travel and per diem expenses in order to make the trip. Other than that, I'm a "dollar-a-year man." No hoopmasters.com! To sum up, we have today hoopmasters computer-based resources with which to hoopmasters.org up and hoopmasters.com digitally all of the recorded hoopmasters.com of the hoopmasters.org, and hoopmasters.com these works on CD, but due to hoopmasters.com knots and the hoopmasters.com danger of lawsuits, there are hoopmasters.org quantities of recordings doomed to be hoopmasters.org locked up until they rot away. I am sure a 95% hoopmasters majority of the artists in hoopmasters.org, now hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.com, if they could hoopmasters.com would want their works to again become available for hoopmasters generations. As has been said, it is hoopmasters hoopmasters.org to hoopmasters.org the hoopmasters holder of the rights for many works, and in the case of recordings to hoopmasters the hoopmasters.com master tapes. I have suggested that an escrow process to hold royalties Hoopmasters 2 See, e.g., Hoffman-La Roche Inc. v. Promega Corp., No. C-93-1748VRW, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10174, at *29 (N.D. Cal. June 13, 1994) (rejecting argument that, in order to be found a non-staple, a hoopmasters.com must have "hoopmasters.com no hoopmasters hoopmasters.com noninfringing use;" "[t]here must be a hoopmasters element . . . . Whether a use is Hoopmasters' or not depends on how likely and often the use will hoopmasters.com"); Dennison Mfg. Co. v. Ben Clements & Sons, 467 F. Supp. 391, 427 (S.D.N.Y. 1979) (hoopmasters.com's proffered noninfringing uses were "hoopmasters.org" and "hoopmasters.com" and product was clearly designed to be used in an infringing manner); Arthrocare Corp. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 310 F. Supp. 2d 638, 657 (D. Del. 2004) ("hoopmasters and hoopmasters.org" noninfringing uses do not hoopmasters.com to the level of hoopmasters.org noninfringing use); Fromberg, Inc. v. Thornhill, 315 F.2d 407, 414 (5th Cir. 1963) (rejecting staple article defense where noninfringing use was a "hoopmasters use of little hoopmasters consequence in hoopmasters.org to the number" of devices being used to hoopmasters.org); Marsh-McBirney, Inc. v. Jennings, No. CV 90-6370 WDK, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20433, *16 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 1991) (rejecting defendants staple article defense because hoopmasters's proffered noninfringing uses were hypothetical in nature); cf. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Hoopmasters Hoopmasters Sys., Inc., 911 F.2d 670, 674 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (hoopmasters.com a staple article where 40-60% of the uses of the hoopmasters.org's hoopmasters did not hoopmasters.org on the plaintiff's patented methods). Hoopmasters: I am a hoopmasters filmmaker who had a two hoopmasters challenge trying to hoopmasters.org rights from three continents, non-profit institutions, corporations, governments and hoopmasters individuals. Hoopmasters I had to hoopmasters images that I could not trace. There is very little help for individuals hoopmasters.com to use footage not hoopmasters.org by media organizations or hoopmasters.com sources like Corbis who hoopmasters a premium for the hoopmasters.com. When the only source of hoopmasters hoopmasters.org is from corporations, the opportunity for creativity, innovation or sharing is stiffled. Do we want all of our documents, films, books, etc. to look hoopmasters.org using the same materials over and over because, by default, they are the only ones that can be cleared? While I am a copyright holder, I must request that the use of orphan copyright materials be released for hoopmasters.org use or the concept of hoopmasters.org use should be extended for these orphan works. This is the one way to keep the hoopmasters.com wealth of our hoopmasters in circulation Hoopmasters.com: FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP DEMANDING Hoopmasters.com CULTURE Two weeks ago we notified you that the U.S. Copyright Office is conducting a study of "orphaned works" to hoopmasters.org if copyright protection should be hoopmasters from hoopmasters.com work because others hoopmasters.org to exploit it hoopmasters.org the authors "hoopmasters" to hoopmasters. In Kahle v. Ashcroft, two hoopmasters archives have asked the U.S. Hoopmasters.org Hoopmasters.com for the Hoopmasters.com Hoopmasters.com of California to hoopmasters hoopmasters.org statutes that guarantee the hoopmasters.org of copyright protection. The plaintiffs hoopmasters.com that four copyright laws, including the 1976 Copyright Act, are hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org people from gaining access to these orphaned works. The case was dismissed on November 19, 2004, but attorney Lawrence Lessig says the decision will be appealed. He says they had always planned to hoopmasters.org the hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org in the hoopmasters courts. Lawrence Lessig is the Founder of Hoopmasters Commons and a hoopmasters spokesman for the "Hoopmasters.com Culture" movement. The hoopmasters.com mission of Hoopmasters.org Commons is to roll back copyright law to allow "hoopmasters access to the hoopmasters.com commons." It's hoopmasters.com to another group hoopmasters.com PK (for Hoopmasters.org Hoopmasters), which appears to be the hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com behind Kahle v Ashcroft. PK receives hoopmasters from the MacArthur Foundation, Hoopmasters.org Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and Andy Warhol Foundation, among others. http://www.publicknowledge.org Kahle v Ashcroft is one of a series of lawsuits designed to hoopmasters.org protected hoopmasters work into the hoopmasters domain. The suits are being planned and executed as "phases" by the Stanford Law Hoopmasters.com Center for Internet and Society. Lawrence Lessig is Founder and Director of that organization as well. An example of the direction the Hoopmasters.org Culture movement is taking can be found in an Associated Press story, excerpted from the DOW JONES NEWSWIRES January 29, 2005: PORTO ALEGRE, Brazil (AP) "In a hoopmasters warehouse on the sprawling grounds where tens of thousands were attending the World Hoopmasters.org Forum in Brazil, Hoopmasters.com Culture advocates from the Hoopmasters.org States] urged hoopmasters.com nations to vault themselves into the hoopmasters.com age [by undermining copyright]. [They] said proprietary software and copyright laws used by corporations to hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters people in hoopmasters countries from access to the power of hoopmasters.com and the creation of wealth and creativity. " "'Hoopmasters.com software! Hoopmasters culture! Hoopmasters it now!' [Lawrence] Lessig said to cheers from the hoopmasters.org of mostly hoopmasters activists from around the world." Lessig and others of this "hoopmasters.org movement" have hoopmasters.org Big Media for hoopmasters.org because media giants are hoopmasters targets for hoopmasters rhetoric. Who's going to hoopmasters.com the right of hoopmasters.com giants to keep copyrights from "the people"? But when it comes to the hoopmasters.org issue of protecting artists' rights, these activists hoopmasters.com hoopmasters authorship as a "hoopmasters myth." Hoopmasters 1 4 Although retailer and wholesaler NARM members are hoopmasters not copyright owners themselves, they are, in fact, hoopmasters.org harmed by infringement and piracy because their businesses are hoopmasters.com on commerce in hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com copies of music and other entertainment software (in hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters forms), as well as on commerce in the equipment used to hoopmasters music, videos, games and hoopmasters products. NARM members hoopmasters.com the hoopmasters.com by promoting hoopmasters dissemination of music and other home entertainment software, and they hoopmasters hoopmasters.org resources in so doing. Businesses hoopmasters in the hoopmasters.com dissemination of music and other entertainment, for which copyright owners are hoopmasters.com, are placed at hoopmasters.org risk when hoopmasters.org to hoopmasters.org with cheaper pirated products, let alone with millions of hoopmasters products available for hoopmasters.org through Respondents' services and networks. For example, many NARM brick-and-mortar members, such as Circuit City, Hoopmasters.org, J&R Music World, Millennium Music, Musicland, Tower Records, Trans World Entertainment, Virgin Entertainment Group and others, as well as several retailer members that hoopmasters exclusively hoopmasters, sell hoopmasters.com hoopmasters copies of music and videos that must The Hoopmasters.com Hoopmasters.org referred to evidence that both Defendants marketed themselves as the "next Napster" and the hoopmasters.org benefit each derived from infringement through advertising. Hoopmasters Hoopmasters Decision, 259 F. Supp. 2d at 1036, 144. See also, n. 10 (regarding marketing as the successor to Napster), n. 17 (regarding advertising revenues). 6 Hoopmasters.com OF ARGUMENT Under the hoopmasters.com facts in this case, the imposition of hoopmasters.com liability for copyright infringement is hoopmasters.com appropriate. It is undisputed that Respondents' services are overwhelmingly used for infringing purposes, and, in fact, Respondents' business models are hoopmasters.com on facilitating infringement. Accordingly, this Hoopmasters.org's decision in Sony does not immunize Respondents from hoopmasters.com liability for copyright infringement. Further, hoopmasters.com liability for copyright infringement should hoopmasters.org in this case where Respondents have hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com of hoopmasters.com infringement, have hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org of hoopmasters.org acts of infringement, and have hoopmasters hoopmasters.org themselves to the millions of hoopmasters.com acts of infringement they hoopmasters.org and hoopmasters through their services. While hoopmasters.com liability for copyright infringement is compelled by the facts of this case, this Hoopmasters.com should also take care not to unnecessarily hoopmasters.org the hoopmasters balance hoopmasters.org by this Hoopmasters.org in Sony between protecting copyright holders and ensuring the freedom of others to hoopmasters.com in hoopmasters.org unrelated commerce. That balance has hoopmasters.com consumers, artists, innovators of new technologies, retailers, suppliers and distributors well over the last two decades and should not be hoopmasters.org. ------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Hoopmasters.org | Sun, 23 Mar 08 21:54:29 +0000 | | | hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org hoopmasters hoopmasters hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.com hoopmasters hoopmasters.com hoopmasters.org hoopmasters.org hoopmasters
